On 26 November 2004 15:09, Keith Wansbrough wrote:

>>> 2. It would be nice if a parse error when reading ghc-pkg yielded
>>>    some information as to the location of the error.
>> 
>> It should do that... can you give an example?
> 
> Here's a simple one (I'm guessing the problem is empty fields - I
> thought they were legal because ghc-pkg describe yields them in its
> output).
> 
> ged:/home/kw217# cat foo.pkg
> name: foo
> version:
> copyright:
> ged:/home/kw217# ghc-pkg-6.3.20041124 register foo.pkg
> Reading package info from "foo.pkg"ghc-pkg: parse error in package
> info
> ged:/home/kw217#

Looks like I've fixed that in my version.  I should be able to commit on
Monday.  Was hoping to commit today, but it looks like somebody's been
playing with package.conf.in files and I have a bunch of conflicts to
fix ... >:|

Cheers,
        Simon
_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc

Reply via email to