On 10 February 2005 21:25, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk wrote:

> Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
>>   GC changes: instead of threading old-generation mutable lists
>>   through objects in the heap, keep it in a separate flat array.
> 
> Interesting: I recently did the opposite in the implementation of
> my language Kogut.
> 
> There seem to be enough differences in the designs to justify both
> decisions.

What makes it easy for us is that we can make dynamically growable
arrays quite easily by chaining blocks from the block allocator.  How do
you do memory management in your system?

Cheers,
        Simon
_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc

Reply via email to