On 13 April 2005 05:11, Wolfgang Thaller wrote:
> Are there any objections against making the output of ghc --make just
> a little bit more informative:
>
>> Chasing modules from: HOC.hs
>> [ 1 of 18] Compiling HOC.SelectorNameMangling (
>> ./HOC/SelectorNameMangling.hs,
>> build/objects/HOC/SelectorNameMangling.o )
>> [ 2 of 18] Skipping HOC.Base ( ./HOC/Base.hs,
>> build/objects/HOC/Base.o ) [ 3 of 18] Skipping HOC.TH (
>> ./HOC/TH.hs, build/objects/HOC/TH.o ) [ 4 of 18] Skipping
>> HOC.FFICallInterface ( ./HOC/FFICallInterface.hs,
>> build/objects/HOC/FFICallInterface.o ) [ 5 of 18] Skipping
>> HOC.Arguments ( ./HOC/Arguments.hs, build/objects/HOC/Arguments.o
>> ) [ 6 of 18] Compiling HOC.Utilities ( ./HOC/Utilities.hs,
>> build/objects/HOC/Utilities.o )
>> [ 7 of 18] Compiling HOC.Invocation ( ./HOC/Invocation.hs,
>> build/objects/HOC/Invocation.o )
>> ...
No objections here, looks like a nice change.
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
