> Maybe I am off the track here, but isn't the right question: Is Darcs > sufficient for fptools? If it is, the one reason to adopt it is because > it is written in Haskell, and we like to promote Haskell.
In fact, darcs is the only Haskell program known to me which is useful to people who aren't Haskell programmers. Regards, Zooko, non-Haskell-programmer _______________________________________________ Cvs-fptools mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-fptools
