Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > Another difficulty (show-stopper?) is the following: > If on the (long-lived) branch you periodically sync from HEAD, these > changes, when converted by tailor) are not equivalent to the respective > changes on HEAD. > That's at least how I understand it; be sure to correct me if I'm wrong.
You're right. Good point. One *could* run tailor up until the point of the merge, and then manually run "darcs pull" to merge using darcs instead of copying the results of the merge that CVS did. One would then want to compare to see if the results were the same. If so, one could return to tailor. If not, one could figure out why not... Regards, Zooko _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
