Sven Panne wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 8. März 2006 13:43 schrieb Sven Panne:
While trying to get back to the bleeding edge, I've noticed that the Happy
homepage http://haskell.org/happy/ still mentions CVS, while there is
already a darcs repo at http://cvs.haskell.org/darcs/happy/. I guess that I
should use the latter, is that correct?
In general: Apart from the GHC 6.4 branch, which projects are still
developed in CVS? Hugs has currently a curious mixture between CVS and
darcs, but Ross mentioned that he might switch to darcs soon, IIRC.
Hmmm, no reply yet... :-( Another minor point: The URIs mentioned on the
project pages for Alex and Haddock look a bit strange IMHO ("cvs" *and*
"darcs" in the URI), they should probably better be the equivalent
http://darcs.haskell.org/alex/ and http://darcs.haskell.org/haddock.
I've fixed those URIs.
My intention is to use darcs from now on for Happy, I still need to
update the web page. Also, the version in darcs requires Cabal, but I'm
not exactly sure which versions of Cabal work.
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
