On 3/10/06, Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10 March 2006 22:11, Lemmih wrote:
>
> > Running 'make fast' in lib/Concurrent still generates tons of garbage
> > and provides no easy way of finding important failures. It's fast but
> > still has exactly the same problems as before.
> ....
> > I don't see the point of running tests when it's not easy to see if
> > they've failed.
>
> I'm bemused - when I run 'make fast' in lib/Concurrent I see each test
> being run, and then I get a summary at the end:
>
> OVERALL SUMMARY for test run started at Fri Mar 10 22:17:09 GMT 2006
> 5 total tests, which gave rise to
> 5 test cases, of which
> 0 caused framework failures
> 0 were skipped
>
> 5 expected passes
> 0 expected failures
> 0 unexpected passes
> 0 unexpected failures
>
> If there are any failures, they get listed right there at the end of the
> run. What's the problem?
Funny, I get this:
OVERALL SUMMARY for test run started at Fri Mar 10 23:23:39 CET 2006
5 total tests, which gave rise to
5 test cases, of which
0 caused framework failures
0 were skipped
0 expected passes
0 expected failures
0 unexpected passes
5 unexpected failures
Something about stage1/ghc not having QuickCheck. However, it's not
imporant. I'll move my tests and we can all be happy.
--
Friendly,
Lemmih
_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
