Hello Bjorn, Thursday, October 5, 2006, 12:05:00 PM, you wrote:
> I have just pushed some patches which add support for stand-alone > 'deriving' declarations. thank you! i like this a lot > deriving Class for Type is 'for' now reserved exclusively for deriving? can i define 'for' function, for example? what is behavior of your extension when there is no access to internals of a type? say, import Data.Map (Map) deriving Typeable for Map > and for multi-parameter type classes: > deriving (Class t1 ... tn) for Type which means that stand-alone deriving has more features than old one? :) -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
