I don't know why this is the case. Ian, could you do a little archaeology to find which patch changed these pragmas? But probably the right thing to do is to put them back to being inlined.
Simon | -----Original Message----- | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | On Behalf Of Bulat Ziganshin | Sent: 12 October 2006 16:56 | To: glasgow-haskell-bugs@haskell.org | Subject: {- INLINE range #-} | | Hello bugs, | | GHC.Arr contains strange quasi-pragmas that missing # in '{-#' | sequence. is it a bug or just a way to temporarily disable pragma? | | | instance (Ix a, Ix b) => Ix (a, b) where -- as derived | {- INLINE range #-} | range ((l1,l2),(u1,u2)) = | [ (i1,i2) | i1 <- range (l1,u1), i2 <- range (l2,u2) ] | | {- INLINE unsafeIndex #-} | unsafeIndex ((l1,l2),(u1,u2)) (i1,i2) = | unsafeIndex (l1,u1) i1 * unsafeRangeSize (l2,u2) + unsafeIndex (l2,u2) i2 | | {- INLINE inRange #-} | inRange ((l1,l2),(u1,u2)) (i1,i2) = | inRange (l1,u1) i1 && inRange (l2,u2) i2 | | | -- | Best regards, | Bulat mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | _______________________________________________ | Glasgow-haskell-bugs mailing list | Glasgow-haskell-bugs@haskell.org | http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-bugs _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
