Sorry. I mis-typed. Then I tried to un-record the patch I had recorded. Darcs crashed (log below).
Since I cannot un-record it, all I could do was to push it. Sigh Anyway, it's a small change fixing a bug in TcSimplify that mixed up implication constraints and implicit parameters; it fixes one of the two bugs reported in Trac #1033 Simon | -----Original Message----- | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lemmih | Sent: 01 December 2006 15:28 | To: Simon Peyton-Jones | Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject: Re: patch applied (ghc): q | | On 12/1/06, Simon Peyton Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > Thu Nov 30 19:42:07 PST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | > * q | > | > M ./compiler/typecheck/Inst.lhs -1 +3 | > M ./compiler/typecheck/TcSimplify.lhs -4 +1 | | q? sh-2.04$ darcs unrecord Fri Dec 1 03:42:07 GMT Standard Time 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] * q Shall I unrecord this patch? (1/1121) [ynWvpxqadjk], or ? for help: y Wed Nov 29 22:52:43 GMT Standard Time 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Remove trace Shall I unrecord this patch? (2/1121) [ynWvpxqadjk], or ? for help: d darcs.exe: failed to read patch in get_extra: Fri Apr 7 11:18:39 GMT Standard Time 2006 Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Fix a bug related to threads blocked on blackholes We weren't making them live early enough, with the result that finalizable objects referred to only by a thread blocked on a black hole could be finalized too early (see conc057 test). Perhaps this is a 'partial' repository? _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
