Hi Tyson, On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 09:14:43AM -0400, Tyson Whitehead wrote: > I'm trying to submit the three patches promissed in trac #1265.
Now all received and applied; thanks for writing them and for persevering with sending them! > 1P- Darcs wants to run through sendmail, but haskell.org (apparently) doesn't > even open the smtp port to machines connected through ISPs. > 1S- Reconfigure the mailer daemon to route through the ISP's mailer. > > 2P- Messages that don't have return paths matching their sending domain are > (apparently) silently dropped. > 2S- Reconfigure the mailer daemon to rewrite the sender envelope to be the > ISP's throw away email account before routing through the ISP's mailer. No idea on these two. > 3P- Messages from non-subscribers are held. > 3S- Hopefully held messages are checked, but I have had bad luck on other > lists in the past, so subscribe and resend patches (after waiting a day). We do check the held messages, but not every day. > 4P- Two of the patches are now being held because they match a header rule. > 4S- ??? (replace with your favourite three letter acronym)! Procmail adds a header to any message which is more than 40k and doesn't have a subject starting "darcs patch" (which is what darcs send uses). Mailman then holds any messages with that header. However, I couldn't find a way to customise the "held" message that it sends. The idea is that large patches (or rather, patches with lots of context) should get through while other large messages shouldn't. Thanks Ian _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
