I've pushed a patch that fixes the segfault that (like I discussed before) was being caused by passing in -rstderr for the ticky file option.
So with that patch, and the patch that Simon just pushed, I think ticky should be OK. As far as I can tell. One thing I noticed: the compiler option for ticky is now just "-ticky" and not "-fticky-ticky", but there are still references to "-fticky-ticky" in the code (e.g., compiler/main/StaticFlags.hs). Moreover, if you compile with -fticky-ticky, you get linker errors because the ticky version of libHSRTS doesn't get passed to the linker. So that's somewhat strange. But the manual does say that -ticky is the right option, and everything works OK with -ticky. Still, I thought it was worth noting. -fticky-ticky is no longer a valid option and references to it should be changed to -ticky, right? I'm not fixing this yet since I'm a little confused about it. Cheers, Tim -- Tim Chevalier * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Often in error, never in doubt Confused? See http://catamorphism.org/transition.html _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
