Thanks Manuel for the heads up.
Don't worry, it had nothing to do with type families. I just was a
bit sloppy yesterday (I would swear I had amended that patch..).
I guess I could have avoided this if I were running validate in a
separate darcs repository, apart from the development one.
Cheers
pepe
On 29/08/2007, at 9:24, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote,
I just ran validate on the current head.
Unexpected failures:
break003(ghci)
break006(ghci)
break012(ghci)
break013(ghci)
break018(ghci)
These have some slight permutation of the output. I don't think
any of that changes the meaning or quality of the output, but Pepe
please double check.
break021(ghci)
This is strange. There is more output than expected. I am not
sure what it means, but I also can't really see how it could be
connected to the type families code.
Pepe, any idead?
Manuel
_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
