On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 22:29 +0000, Neil Mitchell wrote: > Hi Claus, > > > my suggestion: > > - keep it as a separate repo, but let darcs-all fetch it > > - build haddock.ghc during ghc's make, but distribute > > it as a separate tool > > > > that way, it would get daily builds and, more importantly, > > anyone making a change that affects haddock.ghc would > > notice that instantly, and could update it. > > I think its likely that if someone makes a change that effects > haddock.ghc, then David is the person to fix it up. What I think is > more useful is nightly builds, and that isn't just useful for > haddock.ghc, its useful for Yhc, Hugs and everything on hackage! > Perhaps rather than shove another tool into the GHC tool chain, > perhaps someone can setup buildbots in a way that we can easily add > projects to the list?
I agree. We should manage testing the Haskell platform with extra general infrastructure and not by integrating all tools into the ghc platform. Duncan _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
