Claus, is this expected to work with 6.8 ?
There is no ':show languages' option there, so the test fails.
i should have said STABLE branch, i guess.
but this raises a question for those tests referring to
features and fixes that have been merged into STABLE
after release: should those tests be disabled for <=6.8.1?
It passes fine with HEAD here.
thanks.
claus
pepe
On 14/11/2007, at 14:48, Claus Reinke wrote:
I'm testing the fix now. Claus, I'm not very fluent with Python,
care if I send you the patch to ghci024.py for revision?
what little i know of python, i learned for this testsuite!-)
(very odd-feeling language - as if someone had taken perl,
and systematically removed all the features i like; so my
usage is probably very un-idiomatic..)
since ghc 6.9 and 6.8 flags appear to be diverging rapidly, i've
taken the liberty to simplify ghci024.py, to make future edits easier.
i've included Pepe's fixes and accounted for the different
default for -fprint-bind-result in 6.8, assuming that is not
going to be merged (Ian?).
the test now runs clean on a recent head. could someone
please verify with 6.8, and apply this testsuite patch?
thanks,
claus
Wed Nov 14 13:00:43 GMT Standard Time 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* simplify ghci024.py, fix -fprint-bind-result, -fno-ignore-
breakpoints, -fprint-bind-contents
- as ghc 6.9 flags are beginning to diverge, we need
a simpler way of specifying version-specific flags
or settings: have two entirely separate sections,
instead of one section with too many patches.
even if that doubles the script size, it should
be easier to edit. also add a warning that
ghci024.stdout is a generated file.
- default for -fprint-bind-result has changed
- -fno-ignore-breakpoints is gone
- -fprint-bind-contents is new
M ./tests/ghc-regress/ghci/scripts/ghci024.py -11 +112
M ./tests/ghc-regress/ghci/scripts/ghci024.script +1
<fix_and_simplify_ghci024.patch>
_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
