On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 13:26 +0000, Simon Marlow wrote: > Actually there could be a user package DB, and that could cause this to go > wrong (but only if the user has some of the standard packages registered in > their DB, which is fairly unlikely I suppose).
Core packages are upgradable :-) That was part of the point after all. > Ok, so how about > > ghc-pkg list <pattern> --simple-output --latest > > to get just the most recent version of the package. Also we should add a > --no-user-package-conf flag to match GHC. That'd be fantastic, yes. Duncan _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
