On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:35:52AM +0000, Simon Marlow wrote:
> David Roundy wrote:
>> The difference here is that I haven't implemented the time-stamp
>> synchronizing feature for hashed repositories.  I wasn't sure it was
>> still needed (and would be nice to drop, as it's a bit hackish), since
>> for the darcs repository whatsnew is pretty fast.  Will have to add it
>> to the TODO list.

Is there any particular reason why half of this conversation is being
taken off-list?

Stefan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc

Reply via email to