Roman Leshchinskiy wrote:
Hmm, I should have investigated further before posting. That's a very
Intel-specific reason, though. On the Sparc, for instance, it wouldn't
make much sense to implement divInt# in terms of quotInt#, I think (but
then again, we don't have a Sparc NCG).
Anyway, I don't think it's an inliner bug because divInt# and friends
aren't marked INLINE. If nobody objects, I'll go ahead and add the
INLINE pragmas at least. We lose the opportunity to have rewrite rules
for divInt# this way, though, which is a pity.
After inlining you'll get constant folding for quotInt#, so it should be
ok, no?
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
