Hi Isaac, > Or will I have to > #define UTopen (# > #defined UTclose #) > > and (UTopen x, y UTclose)
Yuk! There is a ticket on adding a prefix form of (#,#), which is currently lacking. Perhaps adding that first, then moving to the unboxed thingy would be best. Also your use of # in a CPP macro may confuse various CPP stuff in GHC. I'd also be shocked if it turns out that unboxed types make that much of a difference. They will make a difference in library functions (called a lot), or hot-spots, but in general they only add a constant improvement. Of course, numbers are better than speculation - and would be interesting in their own right! Thanks Neil _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
