Hi > Nevertheless, this is a good start to even more accessible GHC source code.
Yay! I have wanted this in the past. Now that you have GHC working with haddock, having the GHC source code indexed by Hoogle won't be that far away. > PS: Looking at > <http://code.haskell.org/~nominolo/html/ghc/> it might be a > not be a bad idea to switch to hierarchical modules some time now. > Thoughts? We did this for Yhc. It was relatively quick and painless, and the benefits were useful. Recently, when working with GHC source code, I've wanted to find the source to a particular module, which isn't easy as the modules location is not apparent from its name. This change would make that kind of mapping much easier. The disadvantage for GHC will be people working on branches, however darcs should manage most of this and fix up the diff's quite easily. Perhaps its something to do at the very beginning of the 6.11 cycle? Thanks Neil _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
