I don't think "make binary-dist" has worked since then; fixing it is on
my list of things to do. Why is it important for you, out of interest?
If you need to have GHC on a different machine than you build it on then
can't you "make install" and then zip up the directory you install to?
'make; make binary-dist' was recommended to me many years
ago by the folks responsible for making windows snapshots as
the standard way of getting a tar-able relocatable directory full
of GHC goodness on windows, right at the top of the ghc tree
(iirc, one originally had to call some prep-bin-dist-mingw as well).
If binary-dist is unrealistic at the moment, a working inplace
head for windows would still be useful. Any pointers there?
Claus
_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
