Another 'make distclean' removes Parser.hs, but leaves lots of other
.hs files that have .x or .y files:
$ ls compiler/parser/
Ctype.lhs HaddockLex.x HaddockUtils.hs Lexer.x ParserCore.y
cutils.c
HaddockLex.hs HaddockParse.hs LexCore.hs Parser.y.pp ParserCoreUtils.hs
cutils.h
HaddockLex.hs-boot HaddockParse.y Lexer.hs ParserCore.hs RdrHsSyn.lhs
hschooks.c
This includes Lexer.hs, which -unlike Lexer.x- doesn't know about
ITwarning_prag. It seems that the rumours about the build system
having settled down might have been premature?
Another question: why do buildbot builders start from fresh repos?
Shouldn't they test the more common update repo situation?
Claus
make distclean; ./darcs-all pull -a; sh boot; ./configure ..; make
first complained about
parser/Parser.hs:14:36:
Module `HscTypes' does not export `DeprecTxt'
Since Parser.hs and Parser.y looked different, I removed the former
and tried again. But now, I get
dist-stage1/build/Parser.hs:7171:5:
Not in scope: data constructor `ITwarning_prag'
and that constructor really does occur in Parser.y.pp. I've got
no idea why the location of the file in the message has changed,
which suggests that something else is wrong.
Since I always do distclean before pull, this kind of confusion
surprises me, but it does look like leftovers somewhere, especially
since buildbot just went past that stage1.
Do I really have to download the whole ghc-repo tarball again and start from scratch (since there
have been capitalization issues in the repos since I last did that, I doubt that I can use darcs
to copy the old repo?)?
Claus
-- ghc head should come with aspirin
_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
