On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 08:27:44AM +0100, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: > I suspect that is my fault, although I did validate. I will check > > Ian: could validate continue after a Haddock failure, and simply report it > along with other test failures? That would stop a Haddock failure completely > borking the validate run. Or would that be hard?
What's the objective here? We could continue after a haddock error and report it at the end of a build, but is that better than the developer fixing the problem and then running "validate --no-clean"? If you're about to push then you need to fix the problem anywy. Or do we not want to haddock as part of the validate process? This means that the docs will bitrot, and the nightly docs won't build. One thing that isn't helping is that some versions of haddock are pickier than others over what syntax is allowed. Thanks Ian _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
