Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 00:35 +0100, Thomas Schilling wrote:
2008/10/4 Duncan Coutts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
all people who use the ghc-6.10 branch darcs
repos deleting their libraries/bytestring repo and getting the new one.
How is that different from having to call ./darcs-all get? it's just
a 'rm -r' more. I guess the problem would be a confusing error
message? In that case, update darcs-all first to give an error if the
wrong repo is present. This way the usual darcs pull -a; darcs-all
pull -a would not give confusing error messages.
I don't see this as an unusually big pain. Just my two pence.
If we can agree that it is not too bad to do this then I'd be happy.
It's certainly the simplest option.
I wouldn't object to this either, especially if we can make darcs-all emit
a helpful error message.
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
