2008/10/10 David Waern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I resorted to strictness annotations in the Interface structure since > I didn't want Haddock to pretty print everything.
Do you think depSeq on GHC's output would help? IIUC, Haddock processes each file immediately and only retains information in Interface files. So if you force the Interface file all unused Typechecker output can be discarded, no? I don't know how much memory Haddock's post-processing pass takes. Maybe you could stop the GHC session before doing that. Of course, we won't be able to get below GHC resident data + Haddock Interfaces. _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
