On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:53:18AM +0100, Thomas Schilling wrote: > > After some dependency analysis and a (more or less) careful inspection > of the GHC source code, I put together a proposal for GHC's new > hierarchical layout:
Great job, thanks Thomas! I don't really have much to say. On the whole it looks fine to me. A lot of the questions seem quite bikesheddy, and I don't really have an opinion on them. Things like whether to use singular or plural names should be consistent, though. Also, we don't have to get this right on day one. If we decide some modules have ended up in the wrong place, or with the wrong name, then we will have a few months to change them before they get put into a release. Thanks Ian _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
