On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 12:38 +0000, Simon Marlow wrote: > Claus Reinke wrote: > > If packages are patched without any change in version number, > > bad things can happen if one tries to cabal install additional packages > > onto such a patched ghc. > > > > At the moment, that seems to be the case for array and containers, > > which were adjusted following the syb split, without changes in version > > number (containers also seems to have gained some exports, foldrWithKey > > and the like, again without version bump). Could this please be fixed? > > Yes - the policy should be that we bump version numbers according to the > PVP as soon as an API change occurs.
The main thing from the pov of cabal-install is changes to dependencies. Duncan _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
