Wed Feb 4 07:11:03 PST 2009 [email protected]
* Follow error message changes
Ignore-this: bb94510c1fe07abec8711e4e5c346791
M ./tests/ghc-regress/gadt/gadt10.stderr +2
M ./tests/ghc-regress/indexed-types/should_compile/TF_GADT.hs -1 +1
M ./tests/ghc-regress/indexed-types/should_fail/Simple14.stderr +1
M ./tests/ghc-regress/rename/should_fail/rnfail026.stderr -1 +1
M ./tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_compile/tc245.hs -1 +1
M ./tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/all.T +1
M ./tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail028.stderr -1 +3
M ./tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail036.stderr -1
M ./tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail057.stderr -2
M ./tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail058.stderr -1
M ./tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail063.stderr -1
M ./tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail070.stderr -1 +2
M ./tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail078.stderr -1
M ./tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail079.stderr -5 +7
M ./tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail094.stderr -1 +2
M ./tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail110.stderr -7 +6
M ./tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail113.stderr -4 +1
M ./tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail132.stderr -6 +7
M ./tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail136.stderr +2
M ./tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail147.stderr +2
M ./tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail148.stderr +2
M ./tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail160.stderr -1
M ./tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail161.stderr -1
M ./tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail162.stderr +2
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/testsuite/_darcs/patches/20090204151103-1287e-3c3a13b11abce27dc9cd27a57cb0f047e5f83044.gz
_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
