On 18/08/2009 14:37, Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 12:36:35PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
On 07/08/2009 16:57, Ian Lynagh wrote:
Mon Aug 3 03:44:13 PDT 2009 Simon Marlow<[email protected]>
UNDO: Add -r option to darcs-all, and remove push-all (#3375)
Ian - what's the plan for this patch? You pulled it out without
comment.
Ah, sorry, looks like I only commented on the ticket.
Meanwhile I had updated some of my scripts to work with the
new darcs-all, and they are now broken :-(
On the whole it seems like a good change to me.
It broke "./darcs-all record" (and presumably also revert, send and tag)
which I use quite a bit.
I didn't look in detail, but the only advantage seemed to be that we had
one script instead of two.
I don't object in principle to the two scripts being merged, though.
I thought the UI was nicer.
./darcs-all -r ~/ghc-HEAD pull
vs.
./push-all --pull --checked-out ~/ghc-HEAD
having to remember to use push-all rather than darcs-all is slightly
annoying, as is remembering to add --checked-out, and "push-all --pull"
is a bit Doctor Doolittle.. :)
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
