kili: > And here's a little rant... > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:40:50PM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote: > > Tue Sep 15 22:42:54 CEST 2009 Matthias Kilian <[email protected]> > > * Follow the builtin:rts vs. builtin_rts renaming > > > > This unbreaks make install again. > > Why are some parts of the build contantly broken? Why did noone > notice that make install didn't work after that windows-related > change? Why do I have to chase bugs caused by breakage that are > mostly related to build infrastructure? > > Trying to follow ghc-6.11 is mere frustration, but working on a > release (like ghc-6.10) is of course a on-way-ticket, because there > are too much changed between 6.10 and 6.11. > > So what can I do if there are only small windows of a few hours > when ghc 6.11 can be built and installed from both ghc-6.10 and > ghc-6.11 and if the default state of ghc is 'may work or not'?
I'd like to have some clarification on why things seem to be breaking a lot as well. The validator was supposed to catch these issues, for the long term. What's going on? -- Don _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
