Sat Jan 30 10:26:22 PST 2010  Ian Lynagh <[email protected]>
  * Follow error output

    M ./tests/ghc-regress/deriving/should_fail/T2394.stderr -2 +2
    M ./tests/ghc-regress/deriving/should_fail/T2604.stderr -4 +5
    M ./tests/ghc-regress/deriving/should_fail/T2701.stderr -2 +2
    M ./tests/ghc-regress/deriving/should_fail/T2721.stderr -2 +2
    M ./tests/ghc-regress/deriving/should_fail/T3101.stderr -2 +3
    M 
./tests/ghc-regress/deriving/should_fail/drvfail-foldable-traversable1.stderr 
-8 +8
    M ./tests/ghc-regress/deriving/should_fail/drvfail-functor1.stderr -2 +2
    M ./tests/ghc-regress/deriving/should_fail/drvfail-functor2.stderr -4 +4
    M ./tests/ghc-regress/deriving/should_fail/drvfail005.stderr -2 +2
    M ./tests/ghc-regress/deriving/should_fail/drvfail009.stderr -6 +6
    M ./tests/ghc-regress/deriving/should_fail/drvfail010.stderr -4 +4
    M ./tests/ghc-regress/module/mod53.stderr -2 +2
    M ./tests/ghc-regress/module/mod55.stderr -2 +2
    M ./tests/ghc-regress/module/mod56.stderr -4 +4
    M ./tests/ghc-regress/parser/should_fail/readFail039.stderr -3 +3
    M ./tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail086.stderr -2 +3
    M ./tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail117.stderr -4 +4

View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc-6.12/testsuite/_darcs/patches/20100130182622-3fd76-59c1e9108e38adadabfae568b329d9c81360df84.gz

_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc

Reply via email to