Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote: > > The --dph-this shouldn't be there in the configure options, but it needs > to be passed to this invocation to GHC (that it isn't passed is actually > the reason for the error). Why? If DPH is installed, -fdph-par is now > the default. Unfortunately, during the build process, the package DB is > populated with packages at a time where they are not yet available. > (Hence, GHC believes that dph-par is available, though it isn't yet.) > The simplest solution to working around this arguably inconsistent state > of the package DB during the build is to pass -fdph-this to GHC.
Do you mean that GHC now assumes -fdph-par even if DPH isn't used? That doesn't seem right to me. I know we said that it should be the default but I assumed the defaulting would only happen for modules with -XPArr (or whatever the extension is called now) and perhaps -fvectorise. Modules which don't have either shouldn't be able to implicitly depend on DPH, IMO. Roman _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
