Hello,
I'm still fighting with how to precisely get ghc source tree from
github.com. Now I see some issues with libraries/Cabal, concretely what
you get from github.com is different to what you get from
haskell.org/ghc.git.
From haskell.org:
$ ls -la libraries/Cabal/
total 30
drwxr-xr-x 5 karel karel 10 Jul 6 12:17 .
drwxr-xr-x 37 karel karel 44 Jul 6 12:38 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 karel karel 92 Jul 6 12:17 .darcs-boring
drwxr-xr-x 8 karel karel 15 Jul 12 20:54 .git
drwxr-xr-x 6 karel karel 15 Jul 12 20:54 cabal
drwxr-xr-x 5 karel karel 12 Jul 12 20:54 cabal-install
-rw-r--r-- 1 karel karel 7 Jul 6 12:17 ghc-packages
-rw-r--r-- 1 karel karel 347 Jul 6 12:17 HACKING
-rw-r--r-- 1 karel karel 1601 Jul 6 12:17 LICENSE
-rw-r--r-- 1 karel karel 301 Jul 6 12:17 README
$
and from github.com:
$ ls -la libraries/Cabal/
total 106
drwxr-xr-x 7 karel karel 18 Jul 12 22:00 .
drwxr-xr-x 37 karel karel 44 Jul 12 22:02 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 karel karel 92 Jul 12 22:00 .darcs-boring
drwxr-xr-x 8 karel karel 13 Jul 12 22:00 .git
-rw-r--r-- 1 karel karel 5814 Jul 12 22:00 Cabal.cabal
-rw-r--r-- 1 karel karel 16641 Jul 12 22:00 changelog
-rw-r--r-- 1 karel karel 46 Jul 12 22:00 DefaultSetup.hs
drwxr-xr-x 5 karel karel 21 Jul 12 22:00 Distribution
drwxr-xr-x 2 karel karel 7 Jul 12 22:00 doc
-rw-r--r-- 1 karel karel 347 Jul 12 22:00 HACKING
drwxr-xr-x 3 karel karel 3 Jul 12 22:00 Language
-rw-r--r-- 1 karel karel 1742 Jul 12 22:00 LICENSE
-rw-r--r-- 1 karel karel 3508 Jul 12 22:00 Makefile
-rw-r--r-- 1 karel karel 417 Jul 12 22:00 prologue.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 karel karel 4880 Jul 12 22:00 README
-rw-r--r-- 1 karel karel 431 Jul 12 22:00 runTests.sh
-rw-r--r-- 1 karel karel 468 Jul 12 22:00 Setup.hs
drwxr-xr-x 8 karel karel 13 Jul 12 22:00 tests
$
both trees were obtained by classical `sync-all get'. Because github.com
tree is different it also means that build fails just at its start
complaining about missing libraries/Cabal/cabal/ghc.mk -- or something
like that, I don't remember exactly and xterm is closed already. Of
course I can provide on request.
My question is: is it already know issue? Or have I done anything wrong
with this?
Thanks,
Karel
_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
