Ian Simon and I were looking at http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Repositories
Consider the 'containers' line of the table at the bottom. We can't figure out why we need the mirror http://darcs.haskell.org/git-mirrors/containers/.git/. Would it not be an easier workflow to - pull from the containers master repo git://github.com/haskell/containers.git - validate - push to the GHC lagging repo http://darcs.haskell.org/packages/containers.git/ ? The mirror simply imposes a delay, adds complexity, without a visible payoff. (It's different for Darcs repos, for which an automated Darcs to Git conversion is needed.) In short, could we eliminate the entire column "git mirror" from the table? Also, in the picture, what does "local git upstream" mean? Should it not say "git upstream"? Thanks Simon _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
