On 15/09/2011 01:16, GHC Build Reports wrote:

Unexpected failures:
    codeGen/should_run            cgrun059 [bad exit code] 
(hpc,optasm,profasm,threaded2,dyn,profthreaded,optllvm)
    deriving/should_fail          T2701 [stderr mismatch] (normal)
    driver                        5313 [bad exit code] (ghci)
    ghci.debugger/scripts         2740 [bad stdout] (ghci)
    ghci.debugger/scripts         break001 [bad stderr] (ghci)
    ghci.debugger/scripts         break005 [bad stdout] (ghci)
    ghci.debugger/scripts         break006 [bad stdout] (ghci)
    ghci.debugger/scripts         break026 [bad stdout] (ghci)
    ghci.debugger/scripts         break027 [bad stdout] (ghci)
    ghci.debugger/scripts         dynbrk002 [bad stdout] (ghci)
    ghci.debugger/scripts         print002 [bad stdout] (ghci)
    ghci.debugger/scripts         print003 [bad stderr] (ghci)
    ghci.debugger/scripts         print005 [bad stdout] (ghci)
    ghci.debugger/scripts         print006 [bad stderr] (ghci)
    ghci.debugger/scripts         print008 [bad stdout] (ghci)
    ghci.debugger/scripts         print012 [bad stdout] (ghci)
    ghci.debugger/scripts         print013 [bad stdout] (ghci)
    ghci.debugger/scripts         print014 [bad stderr] (ghci)
    ghci/scripts                  2976 [bad stdout] (ghci)
    indexed-types/should_compile  T4160 [exit code non-0] (profasm)
    perf/compiler                 T4801 [stat too good] (normal)
    plugins                       plugins05 [exit code non-0] 
(profasm,dyn,profthreaded)
    plugins                       plugins06 [exit code non-0] 
(profasm,dyn,profthreaded)
    rename/should_compile/T3103   T3103 [exit code non-0] (profasm)

Those ghci.debugger failures are new (since yesterday). I took a quick look, and they all seem to be caused by the debugger deriving Integer rather than an unknown type for some runtime variable - perhaps Integers are evaluated more often now?

So the test results are probably ok, but I'm a little concerned that some of these tests are not testing what they were before.

Ian, do you have outstanding patches to update the output for these?

Cheers,
        Simon

_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc

Reply via email to