OK thanks for the info everyone. I'll look at supporting both gcc and clang depending on availability. The LLVM backend works great with clang but sadly the NCG doesn't so we can't just switch across to clang completely.
On 3 November 2011 10:32, Ian Lynagh <ig...@earth.li> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 10:24:21AM -0700, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote: >> >> It seems pretty clear that in order to get working 10.7 support, the LLVM >> components will require a 10.6 compatible bridge for a year or so. I >> realize that makes David do more work (both to handle the two code paths, >> and because I think which to use will have to be decided at runtime), but I >> don't see a way around it. > > If it helps, future builds I make will be on 10.7, and I don't think > we'll be actively supporting 10.6 (although if it works, all the > better). > > > Thanks > Ian > > > _______________________________________________ > Cvs-ghc mailing list > Cvs-ghc@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc > _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list Cvs-ghc@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
