Hmm so I think I validated a tree without my patches to make sure I
wasn't the offender.

I'll check again when I'm back at work on the 4th.

On 29 December 2011 21:28, Simon Peyton-Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
> David
>
> Any comments?  The patch to interactiveUI was yours I think.  I have not 
> binary-chopped to be sure this is the offending commit but it looks 
> plausible.  And the test is failing consistently
>
> Simon
>
> commit a20cdb930a6f9e980521e0767867217ed96033f4
> Author: David Terei <[email protected]>
> Date:   Wed Dec 21 14:58:39 2011 -0800
>
>    Fix safe imports to work in GHCi.
>
>  compiler/main/GHC.hs     |   26 +++++++++++++--------
>  compiler/main/HscMain.hs |   54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  ghc/InteractiveUI.hs     |   23 ++++++++++++++-----
>  3 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> | -----Original Message-----
> | From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> | Behalf Of Dimitrios Vytiniotis
> | Sent: 22 December 2011 12:19
> | To: [email protected]
> | Subject: validate test failure
> |
> |
> | Hi, in my tree I get  'break012' failing with some fairly small 
> modifications
> | in the output:
> |
> | cd ./ghci.debugger/scripts && HC='/64playpen/dimitris/GHC-
> | HEAD/ghc/inplace/bin/ghc-stage2' HC_OPTS='-dcore-lint -dcmm-lint -dno-debug-
> | output -no-user-package-conf -rtsopts  -fno-ghci-history '
> | '/64playpen/dimitris/GHC-HEAD/ghc/inplace/bin/ghc-stage2' --interactive -v0 
> -
> | ignore-dot-ghci -dcore-lint -dcmm-lint -dno-debug-output -no-user-package-
> | conf -rtsopts  -fno-ghci-history  -ignore-dot-ghci   <break012.script
> | >break012.run.stdout 2>break012.run.stderr
> | Actual stdout output differs from expected:
> | --- ./ghci.debugger/scripts/break012.stdout     2011-11-29 
> 12:00:03.000000000
> | +0000
> | +++ ./ghci.debugger/scripts/break012.run.stdout 2011-12-22 
> 12:17:23.218853401
> | +0000
> | @@ -6,9 +6,9 @@
> |  b :: a2 -> a2 = _
> |  c :: () = _
> |  d :: a -> a -> a = _
> | -a :: t
> | -b :: a2 -> a2
> | -c :: ()
> | +a  :: t
> | +b  :: a2 -> a2
> | +c  :: ()
> |  d :: a -> a -> a
> |  a = (_t1::t)
> |  b = (_t2::forall a2. a2 -> a2)
> | *** unexpected failure for break012(ghci)
> |
> |
> | It's not from my latest patch (just pushed) (I checked with HEAD before
> | pushing) but it's fairly
> | recent (>= 19 Dec). Maybe the latest patches to InteractiveUI etc? Not sure
> | ...
> |
> | Thanks!
> | d-
> |
> |
> | _______________________________________________
> | Cvs-ghc mailing list
> | [email protected]
> | http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
>
>

_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc

Reply via email to