On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 04:58:14PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote: > > Hmm, I indended lnat to be shorthand for "unsigned long". I'd much > rather we used size_t when we mean that, and keep lnat as meaning > "unsigned long".
I'm certainly happy with using size_t instead of lnat. When should lnat be used, though? When would you want a 32-bit value on Windows/x86_64, but a 64-bit value on Linux/x86_64? Thanks Ian _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
