Yes, this is somehow a consequence of the "silent superclass" change. I'm not sure how it validates for Manuel, but this test gives really bad code after the change. I'm investigating.
S | -----Original Message----- | From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On | Behalf Of Ian Lynagh | Sent: 28 June 2012 02:36 | To: [email protected] | Subject: T5113 failing: bytes allocated 822112880 is more than maximum | allowed 9000000 | | | Hi all, | | T5113 is failing validate for me, and also failed on the | HEAD x86_64-unknown-linux nightly build: | | =====> T5113(normal) 2794 of 3389 [0, 786, 0] | cd ./perf/should_run && '/64playpen/simonmar/nightly/HEAD-cam-04- | unx/x86_64-unknown-linux/inplace/bin/ghc-stage2' -fforce-recomp -dcore-lint - | dcmm-lint -dno-debug-output -no-user-package-db -rtsopts -fno-ghci-history -o | T5113 T5113.hs -O >T5113.comp.stderr 2>&1 | cd ./perf/should_run && ./T5113 +RTS -V0 -tT5113.stats --machine-readable - | RTS </dev/null >T5113.run.stdout 2>T5113.run.stderr | bytes allocated 822112880 is more than maximum allowed 9000000 | *** unexpected failure for T5113(normal) | | That's 91 times as much allocation! Does anyone know what's caused it? | | | Thanks | Ian | | | _______________________________________________ | Cvs-ghc mailing list | [email protected] | http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
