On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Simon Hengel <s...@typeful.net> wrote: > Hi, > we have several issues on Haddock's ghc-7.6 branch. I fixed some of > those, but some still persist. > > Isolated, none of those issues are a big deal. But combined they are. > Is there a way we can prevent situations like this in the future? Would > it work to establish the convention that if you change Haddock you have > to build a vanilla Haddock (say without in-ghc-tree) and run the test > suite?
Is there a build bot that builds haddock and runs its tests on a regular basis? That's the best way I know to keep things from regressing without spending too much effort. -- Johan _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list Cvs-ghc@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
