I don't believe it's allowed by Haskell 98. There's also a whole bunch of "newtype" deriving that I'd like to do, but can't for the same reason.
-- Ashley On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 17:29 +0200, Christian Maeder wrote: > I was only surprised by the patch below. > Isn't "deriving Typeable" much easier and safer? > > Cheers Christian > > > Ashley Yakeley wrote: > > Sun Apr 26 17:48:05 PDT 2009 Ashley Yakeley <[email protected]> > > * Typeable instances for all types > > Ignore-this: 48421f072110ddf70b09bd4c030af863 > > > > M ./Data/Time/Calendar/Days.hs +4 > > M ./Data/Time/Clock/Scale.hs +7 > > M ./Data/Time/Clock/TAI.hs +4 > > M ./Data/Time/Clock/UTC.hs +7 > > M ./Data/Time/LocalTime/LocalTime.hs +7 > > M ./Data/Time/LocalTime/TimeOfDay.hs +4 > > M ./Data/Time/LocalTime/TimeZone.hs +4 > > > > View patch online: > > http://darcs.haskell.org/packages/time/_darcs/patches/20090427004805-ac6dd-4cf4de606d27096343156c687b2a37991e055312.gz > _______________________________________________ Cvs-libraries mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-libraries
