cvsuser     04/02/26 10:02:10

  Modified:    docs/pdds pdd15_objects.pod
  Log:
  A bit 'o explanation is in order
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.30      +35 -1     parrot/docs/pdds/pdd15_objects.pod
  
  Index: pdd15_objects.pod
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /cvs/public/parrot/docs/pdds/pdd15_objects.pod,v
  retrieving revision 1.29
  retrieving revision 1.30
  diff -u -w -r1.29 -r1.30
  --- pdd15_objects.pod 26 Feb 2004 09:26:23 -0000      1.29
  +++ pdd15_objects.pod 26 Feb 2004 18:02:10 -0000      1.30
  @@ -525,6 +525,40 @@
     classoffset BaseOffset, $P0, "Foo"
     BOffset = BaseOffset + 1
     getattribute $P1, $P0, BOffset
  +
  +=head1 Explanations
  +
  +To get a new class, you can do a C<newclass>, which creates a new
  +class with no parents besides parrot's default super-ish parent
  +class. (Which doesn't appear in the class list anywhere, though
  +arguably it ought to)
  +
  +To get a new child class, you have two potential options:
  +
  +=over 4
  +
  +=item Subclass the parent
  +
  +=item Create a new standalone class and add a parent
  +
  +=back
  +
  +Both ways work. It is, however, more efficient to use the first
  +method, and just subclass the immediate parent class of your new
  +class.
  +
  +When adding in extra parents in a multiple-inheritance scenario,
  +subclass the first class in the immediate parent list then use the
  +C<addparent> op to add in the rest of the immediate parents.
  +
  +Do be aware that, right now, you should I<not> add attributes or
  +parents to a class that's been subclassed or has had objects
  +instantiated. This will leave the internal structures of the classses
  +and objects in an inconsistent state and things won't work at all the
  +way you want them to. At the moment parrot won't warn if you do this,
  +but it will soon. The restriction on parent list changes and attribute
  +addition will be lifted in future releases, though doing so will be an
  +expensive operation.
   
   =head1 TRANSLATION AND GLOSSARY
   
  
  
  

Reply via email to