dreid 01/06/06 14:49:02
Modified: memory/unix apr_sms.c
Log:
If we don't have a lock and unlock function in an sms module then
it's not an error as this is allowed. Add a comment to this effect
to make it clearer.
Revision Changes Path
1.14 +8 -2 apr/memory/unix/apr_sms.c
Index: apr_sms.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/apr/memory/unix/apr_sms.c,v
retrieving revision 1.13
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -r1.13 -r1.14
--- apr_sms.c 2001/06/05 09:30:37 1.13
+++ apr_sms.c 2001/06/06 21:49:00 1.14
@@ -466,16 +466,22 @@
APR_DECLARE(apr_status_t) apr_sms_lock(apr_sms_t *mem_sys)
{
+ /* If we don't have a lock_fn then we probably don't need one,
+ * so this is OK and we just return APR_SUCCESS
+ */
if (!mem_sys->lock_fn)
- return APR_ENOTIMPL;
+ return APR_SUCCESS;
return mem_sys->lock_fn(mem_sys);
}
APR_DECLARE(apr_status_t) apr_sms_unlock(apr_sms_t *mem_sys)
{
+ /* If we don't have a lock_fn then we probably don't need one,
+ * so this is OK and we just return APR_SUCCESS
+ */
if (!mem_sys->unlock_fn)
- return APR_ENOTIMPL;
+ return APR_SUCCESS;
return mem_sys->unlock_fn(mem_sys);
}
