Never mind. I saw the fix being committed...
Sander
> [...]
> > Sorry. Here's the net, correct patch applied to apr_pools.c;
> >
> > Index: apr_pools.c
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /home/cvs/apr/memory/unix/apr_pools.c,v
> > retrieving revision 1.101
> > retrieving revision 1.103
> > diff -u -r1.101 -r1.103
> > --- apr_pools.c 2001/07/14 22:31:38 1.101
> > +++ apr_pools.c 2001/07/23 22:38:36 1.103
> > @@ -738,23 +738,21 @@
> > }
> > }
> >
> > -APR_DECLARE(void) apr_pool_child_cleanup_kill(apr_pool_t *p,
> > const void *data,
> > - apr_status_t (*cleanup) (void *))
> > +APR_DECLARE(void) apr_pool_child_cleanup_set(apr_pool_t *p,
> > const void *data,
> > + apr_status_t
> > (*plain_cleanup) (void *),
> > + apr_status_t
> > (*child_cleanup) (void *))
> > {
> > struct cleanup *c;
> > - struct cleanup **lastp;
> >
> > if (p == NULL)
> > return;
> > c = p->cleanups;
> > - lastp = &p->cleanups;
> > while (c) {
> > - if (c->data == data && c->child_cleanup == cleanup) {
> > - *lastp = c->next;
> > + if (c->data == data && c->plain_cleanup == plain_cleanup) {
> > + c->child_cleanup == child_cleanup;
> ^^
> This won't do much...
>
>
> > break;
> > }
> >
> > - lastp = &c->next;
> > c = c->next;
> > }
> > }
>
> Sander
>
>
