cvs commit: apr/strings apr_strnatcmp.c

[wrowe]

wrowe       02/02/11 17:52:35

  Modified:    strings  apr_strnatcmp.c
  Log:
    WinCE port from Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  
    I think this question deserves an answer - is this assert legit????????
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.8       +6 -3      apr/strings/apr_strnatcmp.c
  
  Index: apr_strnatcmp.c
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/apr/strings/apr_strnatcmp.c,v
  retrieving revision 1.7
  retrieving revision 1.8
  diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8
  --- apr_strnatcmp.c   13 Dec 2001 17:26:15 -0000      1.7
  +++ apr_strnatcmp.c   12 Feb 2002 01:52:35 -0000      1.8
  @@ -22,10 +22,12 @@
   
   #include <ctype.h>
   #include <string.h>
  -#include <assert.h>
  -
   #include "apr_strings.h"
   #include "apr_lib.h"            /* for apr_is*() */
  +#if APR_HAVE_ERRNO_H
  +/* Do we realy need the assert here ? */
  +#include <assert.h>
  +#endif
   
   #if defined(__GNUC__)
   #  define UNUSED __attribute__((__unused__))
  @@ -92,8 +94,9 @@
        int ai, bi;
        char ca, cb;
        int fractional, result;
  -     
  +#if APR_HAVE_ERRNO_H     
        assert(a && b);
  +#endif
        ai = bi = 0;
        while (1) {
          ca = a[ai]; cb = b[bi];