minfrin     2004/05/21 17:57:02

  Modified:    include  apr_ldap.h.in
               .        CHANGES
  Log:
  Change the order in which ldap.h and lber.h are defined, to fix
  a compile bug in Solaris v2.8 which requires lber.h then ldap.h.
  PR:   27379
  Submitted by: Andrew Connors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.11      +3 -3      apr-util/include/apr_ldap.h.in
  
  Index: apr_ldap.h.in
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/apr-util/include/apr_ldap.h.in,v
  retrieving revision 1.10
  retrieving revision 1.11
  diff -u -r1.10 -r1.11
  --- apr_ldap.h.in     26 Feb 2004 21:55:12 -0000      1.10
  +++ apr_ldap.h.in     22 May 2004 00:57:02 -0000      1.11
  @@ -98,24 +98,24 @@
   /* LDAP header files */
   
   #if APR_HAS_NETSCAPE_LDAPSDK
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]@
   @lber_h@
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]@
   #if APR_HAS_LDAP_SSL 
   @ldap_ssl_h@
   #endif
   #endif
   
   #if APR_HAS_NOVELL_LDAPSDK
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]@
   @lber_h@
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]@
   #if APR_HAS_LDAP_SSL 
   @ldap_ssl_h@
   #endif
   #endif
   
   #if APR_HAS_OPENLDAP_LDAPSDK
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]@
   @lber_h@
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]@
   #endif
   
   /* LDAPv2 SDKs don't use const parameters in their prototypes.  
  
  
  
  1.130     +4 -0      apr-util/CHANGES
  
  Index: CHANGES
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/apr-util/CHANGES,v
  retrieving revision 1.129
  retrieving revision 1.130
  diff -u -r1.129 -r1.130
  --- CHANGES   4 Apr 2004 15:39:27 -0000       1.129
  +++ CHANGES   22 May 2004 00:57:02 -0000      1.130
  @@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
   Changes with APR-util 1.0
   
  +  *) Change the order in which ldap.h and lber.h are defined, to fix
  +     a compile bug in Solaris v2.8 which requires lber.h then ldap.h.
  +     PR 27379 [Andrew Connors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
  +
     *) The whole codebase was relicensed and is now available under
        the Apache License, Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses).
        [Apache Software Foundation]
  
  
  

Reply via email to