mpo 2003/12/31 06:37:13
Modified: src/blocks/woody/samples/flow bindings.js
src/blocks/woody/samples/forms/binding 02lenient-data.xml
Log:
Adding some comments to describe the working of sample '02lenient'
Revision Changes Path
1.2 +12 -11 cocoon-2.1/src/blocks/woody/samples/flow/bindings.js
Index: bindings.js
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/cocoon-2.1/src/blocks/woody/samples/flow/bindings.js,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- bindings.js 30 Dec 2003 17:27:30 -0000 1.1
+++ bindings.js 31 Dec 2003 14:37:13 -0000 1.2
@@ -146,6 +146,9 @@
* Finds the sample specific XML file to bind to and parses it into a DOM
Document.
*/
function createXMLBean(sampleCode) {
+ // note if you want to toss around with the XML model (e.g. sample
02lenient)
+ // then you should do that by editing the files:
../forms/binding/*-data.xml
+
var uri = "forms/binding/" + sampleCode +"-data.xml";
print("Using the XML data file at " + uri);
@@ -203,12 +206,9 @@
var contexts = ["one","two","three"];
for(var i=0; i<contexts.length; i++) {
bean[contexts[i]] = new Object();
- // to see the runtime effect of non-lenient binding
- // swap the following line from comment to code
+ // using javascript beans seem to survive even non lenient binding
+ // so you can do here what you want, the bean itself seems to be
leninet?
//bean[contexts[i]]["breakingField"] = "present";
-
- //IMPORTANT: nothing changes!
- // looks like we have become too lenient?
}
return bean;
}
@@ -218,15 +218,16 @@
*/
function createJavaBeanFor02lenient() {
var bean = new Packages.java.util.HashMap();
- var contexts = ["one","two","three"];
+ // to see the runtime effect of non-lenient binding
+ // remove/replace the 'one' in the following list:
+ var contexts = ["one","two","three"]; // only the 'one' context is
required by non-lenient binding
for(var i=0; i<contexts.length; i++) {
// to see the runtime effect of non-lenient binding
// swap the following 2 lines from comment to code
-// var subBean = new
Packages.org.apache.cocoon.woody.samples.bindings.LenientOKBean("init");
- var subBean = new
Packages.org.apache.cocoon.woody.samples.bindings.LenientNotOKBean("init");
-
- //IMPORTANT: nothing changes!
- // looks like we have become too lenient?
+ var subBean = new
Packages.org.apache.cocoon.woody.samples.bindings.LenientOKBean("init");
+// var subBean = new
Packages.org.apache.cocoon.woody.samples.bindings.LenientNotOKBean("init");
+
+ // the NotOkBean does not have a getBreakingField() required by the
non-lenient binding
bean.put(contexts[i], subBean);
}
1.2 +6 -2
cocoon-2.1/src/blocks/woody/samples/forms/binding/02lenient-data.xml
Index: 02lenient-data.xml
===================================================================
RCS file:
/home/cvs/cocoon-2.1/src/blocks/woody/samples/forms/binding/02lenient-data.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- 02lenient-data.xml 31 Dec 2003 08:05:35 -0000 1.1
+++ 02lenient-data.xml 31 Dec 2003 14:37:13 -0000 1.2
@@ -2,15 +2,19 @@
<root>
<!-- to see the runtime effect of non-lenient binding
comment out one of the 'breakingField' nodes below -->
+
+ <!-- an element named 'one' is required by non-lenient binding -->
<one>
+ <!-- 'breakingField' is required by non-lenient binding -->
<breakingField>init1</breakingField>
</one>
+
+ <!-- elements 'two' and 'three' are optional, but if present, then
non-lenient
+ binding requires them to have a 'breakingField' child attribute -->
<two>
<breakingField>init2</breakingField>
</two>
<three>
- <!--
<breakingField>init3</breakingField>
- -->
</three>
</root>
