Author: toad
Date: 2009-01-21 00:34:49 +0000 (Wed, 21 Jan 2009)
New Revision: 25164

Modified:
   trunk/website/pages/en/faq.php
Log:
Clarify darknet floods


Modified: trunk/website/pages/en/faq.php
===================================================================
--- trunk/website/pages/en/faq.php      2009-01-21 00:32:45 UTC (rev 25163)
+++ trunk/website/pages/en/faq.php      2009-01-21 00:34:49 UTC (rev 25164)
@@ -554,7 +554,7 @@
 keep Freenet as resistant to this as theoretically possible.</p>
 <p>Curiously enough, the above analysis only applies to <a 
href="http://wiki.freenetproject.org/Opennet";>Opennet</a>.
 On Darknet, you might have a little more success, although it would be much 
harder to change your entry point in any significant way.
-Nonetheless, you have a reasonably low bandwidth multiplier (the total number 
of nodes visited, around 20 on average).</p>
+Nonetheless, you have a reasonably low bandwidth multiplier (the total number 
of nodes visited, around 20 on average), and you are severely limited by the 
number of nodes you can connect to, which will be low on a darknet.</p>
 
 <p><b id="hash">Why hash keys and encrypt data when a node operator could 
identify them (the data) anyway if he tried?</b><br>
 

_______________________________________________
cvs mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvs

Reply via email to