Author: toad Date: 2009-01-21 01:23:55 +0000 (Wed, 21 Jan 2009) New Revision: 25173
Modified: trunk/website/pages/en/faq.php Log: Note on predictable content Modified: trunk/website/pages/en/faq.php =================================================================== --- trunk/website/pages/en/faq.php 2009-01-21 01:22:03 UTC (rev 25172) +++ trunk/website/pages/en/faq.php 2009-01-21 01:23:55 UTC (rev 25173) @@ -475,11 +475,11 @@ its neighbours. Hence the attacks on Freenet are completely different to the attacks on Tor. Both compromise to some degree to enable more or less real-time performance.</p> <p>If you can use the darknet, trust your friends, don't reinsert files or insert easily -predictable data, and change your anonymous identity after some volume of inserts, you -should be relatively safe using Freenet. If you can connect, build up some trust in your -anonymous persona, insert your controversial content, and then disappear, again, you are -better off with Freenet, especially if the content is a website. In some other cases, -Tor is better.</p> +predictable data (this requirement will be relaxed in 0.9), and change your anonymous +identity after some volume of inserts, you should be relatively safe using Freenet. If +you can connect, build up some trust in your anonymous persona, insert your controversial +content, and then disappear, again, you are better off with Freenet, especially if the +content is a website. In some other cases, Tor is better.</p> <p>In Freenet 0.9, we will add a form of cryptographic tunnels, somewhat similar to Tor's onion routing; this should greatly reduce the impact of many of the below attacks.</p> _______________________________________________ cvs mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvs
