ACTION ALERT UPDATED                   PLEASE SHARE WIDELY!

Greenpeace Deems Grassroots Global Forest Movement Unworthy of Substantive 
Response 
  re: How FSC Logging of Primary Forests for Toilet Paper "Protects" Them

August 13, 2009
By Forests.org, a project of Ecological Interent

CONTINUE TO TAKE ACTION TO FULLY PROTECT CANADA'S OLD FORESTS FROM GREENPEACE 
GREENWASH HERE:

http://forests.org/shared/alerts/send.aspx?id=gp_ancient_forests

Below is Greenpeace Canada's misleading and obfuscating response to Ecological 
Internet's Earth Action Network campaign to have them stop supporting and 
hailing as some sort of "victory" FSC industrial first time logging of primary 
forests in Canada and globally. Continued advocacy supporting this dangerous 
and antiquated liquidation of life-giving terrestrial ecosystems by Greenpeace 
and pals -- in this case to make toilet paper -- is one of the gravest threats 
to Earth's ecological sustainability, as it is virtually impossible to END such 
practices when others are thoughtlessly supporting them. Our default protest 
email made the following demands and assertions, NONE of which were responded 
to explicitly:

1.)     I demand that Greenpeace repudiate the agreement with Kimberly-Clark 
and not enter into any further negotiations that greenwash old forest logging.

2.)     Greenpeace completely fails to understand that all primary and old 
growth forests are endangered and of high conservation value.

3.)     We call upon Greenpeace to immediately disclose the ecological science 
that suggests primary and old growth forests can and should continue to be 
clearcut to wipe our asses.

4.)     I and many others call upon Greenpeace to immediately globally cease 
and desist from negotiating agreements with industry that continue the 
production of throw away consumer items from Earth's dwindling old forests.

5.)     Further, Greenpeace must immediately disassociate itself from the 
Forest Stewardship Council's (FSC) ongoing certification of first time 
industrial logging of primary forests as being "well-managed" while implying 
sustainability.


These issues were not addressed at all. No defense is made of the underlying 
assertion that logging old forests to make toilet paper with FSC and even 
lesser certification is a desirable outcome. Until Greenpeace can tell us how 
FSC certified logging hundreds of year old trees in millions of year old 
ecologically intact old forests "protects" them in any meaningful ecological 
sense, the campaign continues indefinitiely.

This is too important to let go, and Greenpeace will continue to have its old 
forest greenwash resisted, paying the price in tarnished reputation for such 
ecological treachery. Global ecological sustainability demands full protection 
and ecological restoration of old forests, not apologizing for continued 
consumption of old forest products that is clearly and demonstrably 
ecologically unsustainable. Below is a point by point rebuttal of the less than 
forthright and truthful response with our RESPONSES IN CAPS.

And please remember to join and follow the cause "Protect and Restore Old 
Forests Globally" on twitter at: http://twitter.com/oldforests and on Facebook 
at: http://apps.facebook.com/causes/327890/56161035 . Together we will end 
industrial old forest loss and diminishment,         and usher in an era of 
global old forest ecological restoration.

For Earth,
Dr. Glen Barry

DISCUSS THIS ALERT UPDATE AT:
http://forests.org/blog/2009/08/alert-protest-greenpeace-selli.asp

***************************

RESPONSE RECEIVED FROM GREENPEACE 8/13/09:

Thank you for taking the time to send us an email. 

Greenpeace agrees with you that ancient forests like the Canadian Boreal
Forest need protection. That's why we are happy with Kimberly-Clark's new
policy because it immediately protects areas of ancient forest and will
protect much more over time. 

IN THE STRICT ECOLOGICAL SENSE, IT PROTECTS NOTHING. THAT IS, NO PRESERVATION 
OCCURS. ANY AREA OF ANCIENT BOREAL FOREST IS STILL ELIGIBLE, INDEED PROMOTED BY 
GREENPEACE, FOR FIRST TIME INDUSTRIAL CLEARCUT IF IT IS "CERTIFIED" BY THE 
FOREST STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL OR ONE OF FOUR WEAKER STANDARDS ALLOWED UNDER THE 
AGREEMENT. AGAIN, NOTHING IS ASSUREDLY, EXPLICITLY PROTECTED UNDER THIS 
AGREEMENT.

We launched the Kleercut campaign in November 2004 because of the serious
impact Kimberly-Clark was having on ancient forests. After nearly five
years, with the support of activists and volunteers worldwide, we believe
that we have an agreement that will protect ancient forests.

We hope you understand that complete change does not happen overnight -
neither for governments nor individuals, nor for multi-national corporations
like Kimberly-Clark. But change has already taken place for the betterment
of ancient forests under Kimberly-Clark's new policy. We are confident that
change will continue to happen. Let me tell you how. 

CHANGE NEVER HAPPENS IF YOU FAIL TO ASK FOR THE NECESSARY OUTCOMES. OLD FORESTS 
MUST BE FULLY PROTECTED AND ECOLOGICALLY RESTORED GLOBALLY. THE NEW POLICY DOES 
NOT IMPLEMENT ANY CHANGE, IT IS BASED UPON THE FALSE ASSERTION THAT FSC 
SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT OF FIRST TIME LOGGING OF ANCIENT BOREAL FORESTS 
SOMEHOW "PROTECTS" THEM. IN FACT, IT IS BUSINESS AS USUAL FORESTRY WITH A FEW 
MINOR IMPROVEMENTS. THEY UNDERLYING FALSE PREMISE THAT OLD FORESTS ARE 
RESOURCES TO BE HARVESTED RATHER THAN THE ECOSYSTEMS WHICH MAKE LIFE POSSIBLE 
REMAINS UNCHALLENGED AT GREAT EXPENSE TO THE BIOSPHERE.

For more than seven decades, Kimberly-Clark purchased pulp from the 2
million hectare (5 million acre) Kenogami Forest in Northern Ontario. At
times, they purchased more than 400,000 tonnes of pulp, or 13% of their
total global supply of virgin fibre, from this forest. In recent years, they
also received pulp from the adjoining Ogoki Forest (1 million hectares or
2.5 million acres). These forests hold big intact wilderness spaces that are
vital to species such as woodland caribou. During the evolution of the
policy and as a result of our campaign, today we are happy to say that
Kimberly-Clark is no longer buying pulp from these forests. The reason? The
current manager of the forest, Buchanan Forest Products, refused to meet the
strict ecological criteria that Kimberly-Clark laid out in their new policy.

AND ONCE THESE AREAS ARE GIVEN CERTIFICATION BY FSC OR ANY ONE OF THE OTHER 
FOUR TIMBER INDUSTRY DOMINATED CERTIFICATION SCHEMES, THEY WILL ONCE AGAIN BE 
CUT TO MAKE TOILET PAPER. FROM THE FORESTS' POINT OF VIEW, THERE WILL BE LITTLE 
OR NO DIFFERENCE IN OUTCOMES AS PRIMARY FOREST ECOSYSTEMS ARE CLEARFELLED TO 
MAKE TOILET PAPER. THE "STRICT ECOLOGICAL CRITERIA" IS ANYTHING BUT, AS THE 
PARADIGM OF DESTROYING ECOSYSTEMS FOR THROW AWAY CONSUMER ITEMS REMAINS INTACT.

We believe this is real change on the ground that will lead to more
conservation of these two forests. 

A key element of Kimberly-Clark's new policy is the company's commitment to
stop using any fibre from the world's most ecologically sensitive forests
areas: Endangered Forests and High Conservation Value Forest (HCVF) areas
mapped as no-harvest zones. They also agreed not to source fiber from a
number of other forests, including primary tropical rainforests.  These are
the forest areas that we have been fighting to protect during the 5years of
this campaign.

ALL PRIMARY AND OLD GROWTH FORESTS ARE ECOLOGICALLY SENSTITIVE, ENDANGERED, AND 
OF HIGH CONSERVATION VALUE. GREENPEACE HAS IMPLICILTY AGREED TO TOKEN PROTECTED 
AREAS -- USUALLY ABOUT 10% OF ANY OLD FOREST -- IN EXCHANGE FOR ALLOWING 
KIMBERLY-CLARK TO CLEAR THE OTHER 90%, WITH GREENPEACE'S ENDORSEMENT.

Additionally, Kimberly-Clark is reducing its pressure on ancient forests by
increasing the amount of recycled fibre used in their products, and giving a
preference for post-consumer paper. This will spur increased recycling
efforts and diversion of paper waste from landfill. And during the campaign,
Kimberly-Clark launched a new line of tissue products for consumers that
contain recycled fibre - called Scott and Kleenex Naturals. This is the
first time these brands of consumer products have included recycled fibre. 

PROMISES IN THIS REGARD ARE VAGUE AND INSUFFICIENT. WHAT IS THE EXACT % 
COMMITTED TO? WHY AGREE TO ANY OLD FORESTS BEING IN TOILET PAPER WHEN CLEARLY 
THE EARTH IS PAST ITS CARRYING CAPACITY, ECOSYSTEMS ARE COLLAPSING, WE ARE 
WITNESSING ABRUPT CLIMATE CHANGE, AND ADEQUATE ALTERNATIVES SOURCES OF FIBER 
EXIST NOW. GREENPEACE STILL WANTS THERE ULTRA-SOFT LOO PAPER. CAN THE RICH NOT 
GIVE UP ANY OF ITS CONSPICUOUS CONSUMPTION BASED UPON FOREST ECOCIDE?

The policy also increases the use of Forest Stewardship Council (FSC)
certified fiber, which currently is the only certification system in the
world that supports and verifies environmentally responsible and socially
just forest management. Kimberly-Clark's commitment is to ensure that 40
percent (up from 29% today) of the fibre used in North American tissue
products - representing an estimated 600,000 tonnes - is either recycled or
FSC certified by 2011. This is a very big jump for a corporation the size of
Kimberly-Clark.

THE POLICY SAYS IT WILL TRY TO ACHIEVE FSC CERTIFICATION, BUT DOES NOT LIMIT 
ITSELF TO THIS FOREST CERTIFIER. AT LEAST FOUR OTHER INDUSTRY DOMINATED 
CERTIFICATION SCHEMES ARE ALSO ACCEPTABLE. FSC IS FAILING WORLDWIDE. NO ONE IN 
THE ORGANIZATION WILL RELEASE HOW MUCH OF ITS CERTIFIED TIMBER AND PULP COMES 
FROM FIRST TIME LOGGING OF ANCIENT FORESTS. ECOLOGICAL INTERNET HAS ESTIMATED 
IT AT OVER 50%. FSC GREENWASHES CONTINUED INDUSTRIAL FORESTRY IN MILLIONS OF 
YEAR OLD ECOSYSTEMS, IN THIS CASE TO WIPE OUR BOTTOMS.

Also and very central to our campaign, the company is making big positive
change in the Boreal Forest. In less than a year and a half, Kimberly-Clark
will no longer buy any wood fiber from the Canadian Boreal Forest that is
not FSC certified. They are decreasing this from over 400,000 tonnes in 2007
to zero by the end of 2011. This is real change on the ground. We believe
this will shake up the forest products industry worldwide and to lead to a
decrease in further threats to ancient forests.

Certainly, there is still more to be done. We are not going away. We can
promise you that we will work with Kimberly-Clark to ensure the policy is
fully implemented in the coming years. 

EVEN IF THE POLICY IF FULLY IMPLEMENTED, GREENPEACE HAS PROVIDED EFFECTIVE 
GREENWASH THAT WILL ENSURE THAT MILLIONS OF HECTARES OF OLD FORESTS ARE 
DESTROYED TO WIPE OUR BOTTOMS. NO EFFORT HAS BEEN MADE TO END THESE PRACTICES. 
THERE ARE SOME HUMAN ACTIONS THAT ARE SO EGREGIOUS TOWARDS THE ENVIRONMENT THAT 
THEY MUST BE STOPPED AT ALL COSTS. ONE OF THESE IS BUILDING MARKETS FOR OLD 
FOREST PRODUCTS WHEN THEIR CONSUMPTION DESTROYS BEING AND MUST END.

The challenge is now out to Kimberly-Clark's competitors and the rest of the
pulp and paper sector to stop destroying ancient forests. With your help, we
will continue to pressure these companies to reach and exceed the new bar
for forest protection set by this agreement.

THE CHALLENGE NOW IS TO GET GREENPEACE TO STOP MAKING SECRET DEALS WITH THE 
TIMBER INDUSTRY -- AS WAS DONE IN CANADA'S GREAT BEAR RAINFOREST AND NOW IN THE 
BOREAL FORESTS -- WHICH LEGIMTIMIZE THE MYTH THAT FSC LOGGING OF PRIMARY 
FORESTS SOMEHOW PROTECTS THEM. GREENPEACE DOES NOT SPEAK FOR THE MAJORITY OF 
ECOLOGICAL SCIENCE SAVY FOREST PROTECTIONISTS. WE WILL CONTINUE TO CAMPAIGN 
AGAINST GREENPEACE, RAN, WWF, FOREST ETHICS AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS THAT WORK 
FOR FSC FIRST TIME LOGGING OF PRIMARY FORESTS. 

NOWHERE IN THIS RESPONSE WAS ANY ECOLOGICAL SCIENCE PRESENTED TO BACK UP CLAIMS 
THAT FSC PRIMARY FOREST LOGGING PROTECTS OLD FORESTS. IT APPEARS GREENPEACE IS 
COMMITTED TO WHAT CAN RELATIVELY EASILY BE ACHIEVED RATHER THAN WHAT IS 
ECOLOGICALLY SUFFICIENT IN REGARDS TO OLD FORESTS. GREENPEACE HAS SOLD OUT OLD 
FORESTS TO APPEAR REASONABLE AND EFFECTIVE, WHEN THEY ARE NEITHER.

Please visit http://www.greenpeace.ca/kleercutvictory to find out more about
what is included in this policy, its highlights and the announcement.

-----------------------------------------------
Richard Brooks, MFC
Forest Campaign Coordinator
Greenpeace Canada
 
Office: 1-416-597-8408 x 3039
Cell: 1-416-573-7209
Fax: 1-416-597-8422
 
33 Cecil
Toronto, Ontario M5T 1N1
Canada
 
Turning up the Heat
Climate Change & the Boreal Forest Report
www.greenpeace.ca/turninguptheheat

---
You are subscribed to ecological_internet as [email protected].

Before unsubscribing, please consider modifying your list profile at:
http://www.ecoearth.info/shared/subscribe/[email protected]

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to [email protected]
Or click here:
http://email.ecoearth.info:81/u?id=84041H&n=T&c=F&l=ecological_internet

To subscribe visit:
http://www.ecoearth.info/shared/subscribe/


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to